Wednesday, 24 October 2012

The James Bond Reviews, Part 4: 1995 - 2002.

Part 4, the Pierce Brosnan era, 1995 - 2002. 


17. Goldeneye. If Bond were to survive in a post Cold War environment, and hold his own against action stars like Bruce Willis and Arnold Schwarzenegger, the franchise was going to need a serious overhaul. Thankfully Goldeneye did just that; with a new Bond, an 'M' that directly challenged his sensitivities and a villain that struck a very personal chord. The elements of the classics were all here but this was Bond for a new age, and from the breathtaking opening jump to the brutal fight on the satellite we're with it all the way. Brosnan carries the charm and the wit beautifully whilst Sean Bean proves a perfect counterbalance, and to this day the only lowpoint is Eric Serra's questionable score. 9/10.  

18. Tomorrow Never Dies. Due, in large part, to Jonathan Pryce's somewhat smug portrayal of Elliot Carver, Tomorrow Never Dies repeatedly comes across as trying to be smarter than it is. Never the less there's a lot to like here as well. Brosnan is on fine form, the action scenes are suitably exhilarating (with the BMW 750 reaching new heights in terms of Bond gadgetry) and Terri Hatcher's Paris Carver invoking feelings of Goldfinger's Jill Masterson. Not as strong as it's predecessor, but a worthy edition to the franchise all the same. 7/10.  

19. The World Is Not Enough. Considerably better than it's poor reputation suggests, The World Is Not Enough is, at it's core, a very relevant spy thriller, which goes to great lengths to push the franchise forward and, in terms of it's villain, offer a new twist on a tried and tested routine. Denise Richards' nuclear scientist notwithstanding, there's a strong cast behind this one as well, and save for a few painful christmas puns Brosnan brings a level of darkness to Bond that hasn't been seen since Timothy Dalton. 8/10.  

20. Die Another Day. There's a very promising start to Die Another Day, where even the title sequence manages to move the story forward and set up what could be a very promising edition to the franchise. Within an hour, however, the film looses it's way with invisible cars, a laughably implausible villain and a cringeworthy CG surfing sequence the mere tip of the films problems. The cast here aren't up to measure either, and while Brosnan gives the role his all his co-stars add little flavour, with questionable performances from Toby Stephens and Halle Berry and with John Cleese proving far from a worthy successor to the late Desmond Llewelyn. 4/10. 

Saturday, 20 October 2012

The James Bond Reviews, Part 3: 1987 - 1989.

On to Part 3, this time the two films spanning the Timothy Dalton era, 1987 - 1989.


15. The Living Daylights. Truly the dawn of a new era for Bond, and though snippets of the Moore films break through in a couple of the action sequences, most notably the cello case escape down the mountain, they are taken in stride and don't demerit the film. Dalton himself slides effortlessly into the role, channeling Connery rather than Moore, but with added intensity, darkness. The romanticised portrayal of the Mujahideen terrorists lessons the otherwise realistic tone of the film but don't damage it too much, whilst the highlight remains the breathtaking aerial fight upon the netting of a cargo plane. 7/10   

16. Licence To Kill. If there's a rulebook to making a Bond film, Licence To Kill to breaks it, and is thankfully better for it. For the first time since On Her Majesty's Secret Service we're let further into the psyche of Bond, as the filmmakers expand on the darkness present in The Living Daylights, strip Bond of his licence to kill and take him on a revenge fuelled quest to take down an drug cartel after an attack on longtime friend Felix Leiter. Though considerably humourless than one would expect from a Bond film there is still a lot of fun to have here, with Desmond Llewelyn providing much of the charm whilst an array of impressive stunt work ensures we never forget which franchise we're watching. The franchise was put on hiatus after this but Licence To Kill should never be under appreciated; and as the tone of the Daniel Craig films suggests this was merely ahead of it's time. 9/10.

The James Bond Reviews, Part 2: 1973 - 1985.

Continuing my countdown to Skyfall by offering mini reviews on each of the films thus far, we come to the Roger Moore era, 1973 - 1985.



8. Live And Let Die. A truly surreal Bond outing that fuses the 'Blaxploitation' films of the 70s with Voodoo and Rednecks, as Bond traces a heroin smuggling operation from Harlem to the Caribbean by way of Louisiana. Though a refreshing change of pace to the Bond formula, none of the elements mesh particularly well, and in his first outing Moore stumbles through the role unsure of how to play it. Like this era as a whole, Moore's performance and the film can never quite work out what they want to be. 6/10. 

9. The Man With The Golden Gun. Proof that his enemies favour outlandish gadgets perhaps more than Bond himself, the title character of Scaramanga is one of the few reasons to watch Moore's second entry, as Christopher Lee does away with the theatrics to present a quieter, but no less menacing villain. Though Moore himself begins to make Bond his own, the script does not fully allow for this, with the character being shown-up by his foe, comical car chases and even a couple of teenage girls. Not the worst of the Moore era, but far from the best. 6/10. 

10. The Spy Who Loved Me. Often regarded the best of the Moore films and there is a lot to like here. Though The Spy Who Loved Me rehashes a tried and tested formula for Bond it does so in satisfying fashion, with the sets being the most impressive of the series to that point, the girl a refreshing equal to Bond and the submersible Lotus Esprit on par with the Aston Martin. Moore's Bond finally comes into his own, and the film remains a high-point to the series. 8/10.   

11. Moonraker. For Your Eyes Only was the next planned in the series, with Moonraker being rushed into production due to the popularity of Star Wars. Like Live And Let Die before it, Moonraker doesn't quite know what to do with itself, and the absurdity of the laser guns and space battles don't suit the franchise in the slightest. It's hard to tell if the whole thing was a knowing parody or meant to be taken deadly serious, and to this day remains one of the weakest in the series. 4/10. 

12. For Your Eyes Only. A thankful return to Earth in more ways than one after the space battles of Moonraker, For Your Eyes Only comfortably downplays a lot of what had driven the previous entries in the franchise. There is no outlandish villain or plot for world domination here and the action sequences remain slightly more grounded, more realistic. As Moore starts to show his age, so does the character, and for the first time we see a portrait of a man grieving for everything he has lost, including, as the pre-title sequence sets out to remind us, his wife. Though not quite as dark or serious as the series would become during Dalton's era, For Your Eyes Only is nevertheless a step in the right direction. 8/10. 

13. Octopussy. Octopussy is another mixed bag in the franchise. For the most part it is a much more serious entry and features one of the most distressing pre-title sequences ever, but it is counteracted by the treatment of Bond himself, who in one scene emits a Tarzan cry as he swings through the jungle and is later caught dressing up in both a gorilla outfit and a clown, where he is publicly laughed at. The Indian setting makes for an engaging location and an increased role for Desmond Llewelyn is welcome, but not for the first time in the Moore era it's the handling of Bond that let's it down. 6/10. 

14. A View To A Kill. Like Moore himself here, the franchise looks old and tired, with A View To A Kill simply rehashing a lot of what has come before. Though Christopher Walken breathes suitably malicious life into Max Zorin, there's no hiding the fact that we're watching Goldfinger all over again, simply replacing Fort Knox with Silicon Valley; Oddjob with May Day. The mine set and the finale atop the Golden Gate Bridge hold a little merit but they're not enough to save the film, and with them the Moore era bows out on a whimper. 5/10.  


Friday, 19 October 2012

The James Bond Reviews, Part 1: 1962 - 1971.

To count down to the release of Skyfall later this month, I've decided to offer mini-reviews on each of the Bond films, era at a time. To start things off, it's the Connery/Lazenby era, 1962 - 1971.  


1. Dr. No. Though the film remains very much of it's time, the character is instantly timeless. Connery infuses Bond with roguish charm to form a new type of action hero whilst Ursula Andress lays claim to the greatest entrance in cinema history. Exotic locations and breathtaking sets help mask a somewhat rushed third act, and though the title villain is a little underdeveloped the tease of SPECTRE neatly sets up what will became a staple of the forthcoming films. 7/10.

2. From Russia With Love. Not so much a Bond film as we look at them today, but certainly a gripping spy thriller in it's own right. Though slow paced when compared to the rest, the climatic brawl on the Orient Express alone is enough for the film to earn it's place amongst the greats. 8/10. 

3. Goldfinger. The one to which all others are compared, and which truly laid the formula to all that follow. The megalomaniac villains and extravagant plots for world domination; the beautiful women, fast cars and nifty gadgetry have been both a staple and a source of parody for the series since, but it's here that they were all truly utilised for the first time and make Goldfinger nothing if not iconic. Auric Goldfinger himself serves as a welcome change of pace from the exploits of main adversary SPECTRE  in the other films of the era; Pussy Galore remains the most memorable Bond girl save Andress's Honey Ryder and the Aston Martin DB5 is, like the film itself, timeless. 8/10.

4. Thunderball. Bigger and better was the order of the day for Thunderball, and though it's often overlooked for being the immediate successor to Goldfinger there's a lot to like about the series' fourth entry; Connery is on impeccable form, the locations are suitably exotic and, keen to show off the increased budget, there's some thrilling underwater photography. If the film suffers it's that the underwater scenes last a little too long and drag the film to an unnecessary length, but they were a new direction for the series and for cinema of the time, and the fact they've been replicated in several Bond outings since only shows what an impact the film made. 7/10.

5. You Only Live Twice. Famed for it's Japanese locations, the literally mountainous volcano lair and the long awaited reveal of Blofeld, the cat-stroking head honcho of SPECTRE, You Only Live Twice is certainly memorable, but often becomes little more than a cartoonish spectacle. As suitably villainous and iconic as Donald Pleasance is as Blofeld (a performance that was never topped for the character), the volcano lair and the collapsable bridge into a pool of Piranhas turns the film a little too comical. Bond himself is treated little better here, with a bizarre attempt to turn Sean Connery Japanese and an aerial repeat of the famed Aston Martin chase in Goldfinger with the autogyro Little Nellie. Fun, but stretches the believability behind Bond a little too far. 6/10.

6. On Her Majesty's Secret Service. Often overlooked for being George Lazenby's sole outing for the character, On Her Majesty's Secret Service is arguably the most important addition to the franchise and one that helped develop the character of Bond to considerable lengths. Though Lazenby's performance doesn't live up to Connery's (or indeed any of the successors'), the film is considerably less formulaic than some of the others and actually crafts a compelling love story (with subsequent marriage) at it's core before delivering the most shocking, and heartbreaking ending to the franchise to date. This is also the film that introduced the series to snow covered mountain tops and thrilling ski chases, which, like Thunderball's underwater scenes, have become a staple of the franchise since. Sadly Terry Savalas doesn't quite live up to Donald Pleasance in bringing Blofeld to life, and though the actors for Blofeld and Bond have changed it's hard to buy that the characters don't immediately recognise each other either. Counter in Lazenby's breaking of the fourth wall at the beginning and On Her Majesty's Secret Service, though important, is not quite as timeless as it could have been. 7/10.

7. Diamond's Are Forever. Replace diamonds with gold and on paper it feels like we've seen Diamond's Are Forever before. Guy Hamilton was back behind the camera; Shirley Bassey to sing the theme. Famed American locales, audacious character names and, of course, a return of Sean Connery and Diamond's Are Forever becomes Goldfinger's spiritual sequel, and with the path set in the previous outing for a revenge fuelled Bond the film had everything going for it. Sadly, however, that's not the case, and more often than not Diamond's Are Forever becomes a highly camp parody of the franchise, all but ignoring the events of On Her Majesty's Secret Service in favour of cheap laughs, pantomime villains and easily escapable situations. Even Connery isn't enough to save this one, appearing to have aged twenty years since You Only Live Twice and offering a bored, ham-fisted performance. 4/10.

Monday, 24 September 2012

The Power of Three - Well, nearly...

Four episodes down, one to go, and finally we get to spend a bit more time with the Ponds. But lest we forget that this is a Chris Chibnall episode, and there's yet to be a truly great one. Okay I'm selling Power of Three a bit short there, because compared to Dinosaurs on a Spaceship, Three is an absolute masterpiece. In truth there's lots to like here, especially for long time fans of the show, but childish antics from the Doctor early on and an underdeveloped third act make Three another disjointed mess. 


For the second episode running, we start here with a somewhat pointless voice-over. Last week it was the little girl who had absolutely nothing to do with anything, this week it's the turn of Amy Pond, spelling out that what we already know or that what is happening on screen. Before the opening credits have even rolled, all intrigue surrounding the little black cubes has been eliminated, for as Amy so pointedly tells us, this is the year of the slow invasion. 

But of course, this is Doctor Who. We could guess that little black boxes appearing all over earth has something to do with an alien invasion. Cue: the Doctor. But this is the year of the slow invasion. The answers aren't coming thick and fast here, and while it presents a refreshing change of pace for the show, by the time the ball does get rolling there is little reason left to care. Three is an episode of two halves: one part Doctor Who, one part day time soap opera; and while both have their merits the two halves don't compliment each other, and both suffer from some questionable writing. 

First up, it's the return of Pond Life, Chibnall's five minute 'prequel' to the series, which, as usual, became less about the Ponds, more about the Doctor. And there's something about Chibnall's Doctor that makes me feel like I'm too old for this show now; for while it will undoubtedly get a raise out of the younger audience, a rapping, surf-boardng, fence-painting, Wii-playing, football bouncing Doctor makes me cringe. We get it. He doesn't do well with the mundane. He's a man out of his element. But somehow, not even Russell T Davies's attempts at making the Doctor relatable to the kids were this out of character. 

Thankfully the Doctor of old is back before too long, and in more way than one with the added presence of U.N.I.T and, in a welcome throwback to the classics, a Lethbridge-Stewart. But now we enter the disjointed second half, and one where the title - The Power of Three - should really come into it's own, but doesn't. As the Doctor points out, the three refers to himself, Amy and Rory, but here's where you realise that despite being set on their home turf, once again Amy and Rory just don't do anything. As the Doctor faces off against a projection of the episodes' big bad, Amy and Rory are given the challenging task of rescuing Rory's father, which they presumably perform admirably, off-screen. Earlier on in the episode it wasn't the Doctor, Amy and Rory who studied the cubes, it was the Doctor, Amy, Rory, Brian and U.N.I.T. Maybe if the number had further resonance in the episode; if, say, the cubes had counted down from three instead of seven, the title might have held more relevance, but as it stands these last four episodes haven't done much in convincing us that there is any more power within their trinity than any of the Doctor's previous companions. Presumably we're in for a major revelation next week that will forever change the status-quo, but by that time will it be too little, too late? 

Friday, 21 September 2012

'Avengers Assemble' - Blu-ray Review.

It's finally here. The long awaited dream from fanboys the world over. The film we've been waiting for since Robert Downey Jr first donned the scarlet and gold. The Avengers. On Blu-ray. 



What was the defining factor in Avengers' record breaking, billion dollar box office intake? Was it the drawing power of Downey Jr, Evans, Hemsworth and Johansson? Was it the idea of a superhero team up, something new for the comic book movie genre? Was it the heap of possitive reviews and glowing word-of-mouth or was it the match-made-in-Heaven idea of Downey Jr voicing Joss Whedon dialogue? (or was that one just me?) Honestly, it doesn't matter. The Marvel movie-verse was a unique experiment and one that's paid off; The Avengers - or, as it's been dubbed here in the UK, 'Avengers Assemble' - is the icing on an already succulent cake. 

On paper the Marvel-verse is a hard sell to the comic-ignorant public. Where DC have the cultural icons like Batman, Superman and Wonder Woman to their name, Marvel's movie characters here are largely second stringers, with rights to their power-houses like Spider-Man and the X-Men sold off to different companies. Before Downey Jr, you could be forgiven for believing Iron Man to simply be a poor-man's Batman; or Captain America to largely be a patriotic joke outside of the US. But Marvel saw something in their characters that most others couldn't, and without wavering, without succumbing to pressure to make every comic book film like Christopher Nolan's The Dark Knight, they've silenced the naysayers and given their characters voices of their own. With a series of fun, true-to-character films, accessible to a large and diverse audience, Iron Man is a now name on par with Batman; Captain America with Superman. A Norse God that becomes a superhero? A World War II 'super solider'? Sure, why not? What if they band together, fight aliens and work for the US government, operating off of a flying aircraft carrier? Perfectly feasible. 

Six films, five years. Was Avengers worth the wait? In a short answer, yes, it really was. Avengers is not just the ultimate comic book film, it's an exceptionally well crafted film in its own right, with a script that is at all times funny, exciting and even moving as well. It's no easy task, balancing four major characters, plus a handful of side-players, and making sure each is given their due, but Avengers does so with incredible ease. With Buffy, Angel and Firefly to his name, Joss Whedon has long since proven he's known how to handle an ensemble, but it's one thing balancing a large cast when you've got twenty-two episodes of a series to play with and quite another when you're limited to a two hour plus time frame of a movie. Even in Serenity, Whedon's under-appreciated film continuation of Firefly, characters are pushed to the back (or killed outright) without their chance to shine. Here, however, it's a different story. Of all the film's speaking roles, only do Cobie Smulders' Maria Hill and Stellan Skarsgard's Dr. Selvig feel remotely underdeveloped, but theirs are roles that, while vital, shouldn't feel intrusive or deter the focus from the top players. 

Like it's predecessors, Avengers is a visual treat and the Blu-ray only enhances this. The Hulk is more lifelike than ever before, Cap and Thor's powers are showcased beautifully and if you thought witnessing Iron Man suit up was impressive in previous outings, here we're treated to a flawless display of technical wizardry, as Stark's armour is removed, hands free, as he descends down some steps. There is controversy, however, surrounding this UK Blu-ray release, with Disney/Paramount having held back on some of the extra features available in other countries and even re-editing the film as well, digitally removing the blood-stained spear tip protruding from the body of the impaled Agent Coulson. With Disney publicly announcing that no 'special edition' of the film is on it's way, it's frustrating to witness their treatment of the third highest grossing film of all time on a sub-par home release, and we're left questioning whether their partnership with Marvel Studios is really for the better. 

What the future holds, however, remains to be seen, and spear tip or no spear tip, commentary or no commentary, The Avengers can still be enjoyed. It's here to stay, and as the Marvel cinematic universe continues to expand with Iron Man 3, Thor: The Dark World and Captain America: The Winter Solider our enjoyment of these characters, and these films, will continue for years to come. These films stand as proof that not every comic book adaptation needs to resemble Nolan's Bat trilogy, and that to craft a financially successful and critically acclaimed film you need only remain true to who the characters are in the comics, and to treat them with a little respect.  

Monday, 17 September 2012

A Town Called Mercy - More Westworld Than Western.

The seventh series of Doctor Who continues, and despite getting my wish of more stand alone episodes I'm now left feeling that an arc would have helped things greatly. Three episodes down and two to go until the Ponds' big farewell, but as was the case with Dinosaurs the two are sidelined here with little to do. Despite Moffat introducing a little drama into their relationship in his season opener, these last two episodes feel like they could have been picked from anywhere in the last two years without anything having changed. 



It was Moffat's intention that these five episodes feel like 'mini-movies', and while Asylum invoked feelings of Escape From New York and Dinosaurs struggled as to what it really wanted to be, we actually have an episode here that isn't a play on any particular movie but rather a genre as a whole. Sadly, however, the genre isn't utilised to great potential here, and while it could have invoked feelings of Clint Eastwood's more haunting, ambiguously fantastical films like Pale Rider or High Plains Drifter, it's left feeling like the bastard son of Westworld and Cowboys and Aliens instead. 

Initial disappointment aside, however, Mercy is not entirely unwatchable. Unlike the shows first foray into the genre in 1966 with The Gunfighters, Mercy is helped with a largely American cast and the same Spanish locations favoured by Sergio Leone in his famed Dollars trilogy, never missing an opportunity to utilise to great effect. Sadly it's the script that isn't up to scratch, for while it offers scenes of moral anguish for the Doctor, building upon his decision to kill Solomon last week and foreshadowing his reaction to Amy and Rory's impending departure, the rest of the characters are all useless. Farscape's Ben Browder is eliminated all too quickly, whilst the other town's folk are left standing awkwardly in the background, unsure of what to say or do until otherwise instructed. Karen Gillan makes use of her one big scene, confronting the Doctor in his descision to kill Kahler Jex, but it's a role expected from Amy and doesn't move her story forward. Arthur Darvill's Rory, on the other hand is reduced to the role of one-time decoy alongside Browder's Sheriff Isaac, where no meaningful dialogue is passed and the two merely hide behind a rock. 

The plot here is a lacklustre affair as well, though the episode should be praised for allowing the all too predictable revelations to come early on. Kahler Jex makes for an unengaging 'villain' whilst the Cyborg is more Terminator than Man-With-No-Name, an already limited performance lost beneath layers of questionable prosthetics and giant blaster cannons. 

In the end, the underlining problem with Mercy is that it forgets it's a Western. Deserts and stetsons will take you so far, but Westerns are built upon characters, and it's the characters that Mercy dismisses. I believe that Doctor Who is a show that could lend itself perfectly to the Western genre since, like the Eastwood greats, it's all about an unnamed hero. The Doctor is the Man With No Name, and cowboys, at their core, are alien themselves. They're travellers who come into a town and adapt to survive. The genre doesn't bend around them, they bend around the genre. There is no need for the stark contrast between cowboys and aliens that Mercy offers because there simply isn't one. Less is more with westerns, and that should have been the case here. 

Thursday, 13 September 2012

Top 5 'New Who' single episodes.

With Asylum being as good as it was and Dinosaurs being such a disapointment, I figured it was time to reflect on the last six seasons of Doctor Who with my top five single episodes. A top five two-parters and top five classic stories will come at a later date, since they're all so differently paced I feel it unfair to group them all together.

So without further ado...

5Dalek. Season 1, episode 6.

There's precious little to like in the first series of the revived show. Eccleston gives the show his all but out of thirteen episodes there are only three genuinely good ones, and two of those make up one story. The other one is, of course, Robert Shearman's Dalek; an episode to be praised on not only telling a decent story but on telling its audience exactly what this show is capable of. For it's true; what type of show Doctor Who was was still in question after the first few episodes, but Dalek was here to say that you don't need to pander to the younger audience with burping bins and farting Slitheen, that the show survived for over twenty years in keeping the fun, the drama and the scares on equal footing.

In many ways this is the first real episode of the revived Doctor Who, and what better way to give birth to the series than by bringing in the most iconic and the most feared of all the Doctor's adversaries. But there's a twist to Dalek, because however merciless and menacing this creature of Skaro first appears, by episode's end we're actually starting to feel for it, whilst the Doctor himself is now shown in a much darker light. As true to the classic characters as this episode is, it does an outstanding job of reinventing them at the same time, drawing upon the parallels between the two to present equal sides of the same coin. Here, both Doctor and Dalek are victims of the Time War, where both believe themselves to be the very last of their respective species, whose only goal now is to survive the only way they know how. Eccleston is top of his game here, and though we saw precious little of the Ninth Doctor this episode stands as a shining beacon as to who he was.


4. Vincent And The Doctor. Season 5, episode 10. 

There's an ongoing trend in Doctor Who in which the Doctor meets esteemed figures from Earth's past, but more often than not the episodes can never quite work out what they want to be, often favouring the monster of the week over the figure themselves and resulting in a disjointed mess. Dickens, Shakespeare and Agatha Christie all had their shot under Russell T Davies' tenure, but all that we remember about the episodes are witches, giant wasps and endless Harry Potter references. When Richard Curtis came on board to tell us a tale of Vincent van Gogh, however, he tried a different tactic: let the episode focus on the man, not the monster.

If there's one underlining strength behind Vincent it's that the episode is refreshing. It feels both natural and brand new at exactly the same time; for what Curtis, an esteemed writer but not of science-fiction, has delivered here is an outsiders perspective, and one that really helped distinguish the shows new direction under head writer Steven Moffat. Vincent isn't for everyone, but Doctor Who has thrived on being the show that can be absolutely anything, and for one week only here Curtis broke the rules and did things his way. On one level Vincent is just another monster of the week episode, but here the monster is so connected to van Gogh's madness that it becomes a part of the character. The whole episode is a heartbreaking portrait of an entirely different type of mad man than we're used to, and it's hard not to look back and think it's exactly what The Shakespeare Code or The Unicorn And The Wasp needed to be. Sure the Doctor breaks his own rules by taking Vincent to witness his legacy at the end, but through Murray Gold's rousing score and Tony Curran's sterling performance it's hard not to be taken in by it.


3. The Girl In The Fireplace. Season 2, episode 4. 

If there's something guaranteed to split the fanbase in two it's the subject of the Doctor and love. Is the Doctor completely asexual or is he, like anyone else, capable of falling in love? It's a fair question, since the closest a classic series Doctor came to romance was a confused kiss between the Eighth Doctor and one-time-companion Grace Holloway in the TV movie. If the revived series has taught us anything, however, it's that the Doctor can, indeed, fall in love, or is at least capable of romantic feelings. Yet the doomed relationship with Rose Tyler or impromptu marriage to River Song aside, the Doctor's most genuine - and most tragic - love story came early on in the Tenth Doctor's tenure, after a happenstance meeting with Madame de Pompadour.

The first story penned by Steven Moffat since his highlight of the first series, The Empty Child/The Doctor Dances, Fireplace is a fine example of what makes Doctor Who so unique and endearing and truly stamped Moffat's name as one of the greatest writers in the shows long history. This is a boy meets girl story, but in true Who fashion this is boy meets girl through a time window to 18th century france on a 51st century spaceship, where girl is being haunted by clockwork killers. As weird as this all sounds, however, we never question what's happening for a second; A well-paced script mixed with fine performances from Tennant and Sophia Myles sell the relationship while the clockwork killers remain some of the scariest and most beautifully designed monsters the show has ever produced. If there's one flaw to Fireplace - aside from the one sequence involving a horse, a mirror and questionable CGI - it's that the episode focusses too much on the Doctor's love story and sidelines the two companions; one of whom is experiencing his very first trip in time and space and should maybe be given more to do. It's a small point to make, however, in an otherwise all-round solid episode and a highlight of the second series.


2. A Christmas Carol. 2010 christmas special.

Doctor Who was going from strength to strength under Moffat's reign in series five. Succeeding where Russell T Davies usually failed he rounded out an engaging first year with a spectacular season finale, with drama, comedy and as many twists and turns as one could possibly hope for. The ultimate test, however, was the christmas special, which we all looked forward to every year but more often than not came away sorely disappointed. Be it Titanic in space or giant Cybermen in Victorian London, Davies' specials were disjointed mess after disjointed mess; bigger for the sake of bigger, with their only link to christmas being repeated use of robot Santas and deadly spinning christmas trees. 

Moffat, thankfully did away with all that. Gone were the extravagant action sequences and cheap, christmas monsters; this was Dickens meets Star Trek by way of Jaws, in a suitably outlandish retelling of A Christmas Carol, Doctor Who style. This is a fine example of everything coming together when it needs to. Michael Gambon leads an all round stellar cast, the script, direction and production design are all on top form and Murray Gold is, as always, unbeatable. As quirky, beautiful and heartbreaking as one could hope for, this is the first - and going off last years unremarkable outing, only - christmas special to feel both christmassy and special. One to be enjoyed time and time again. 


1. Blink. Season 3, episode 10.

This one was a given, wasn't it? Constantly topping fans lists of the best New Who episodes or all time greats, Blink is proof that the show is loved for so much more than just a mad man with a box. For it's true, the Doctor himself is given remarkarbly little do to here, and though his few scenes are nothing if not memorable (this is where "wibbly-wobbly, timey-wimey stuff" was first uttered) they are just one small part of an episode that is so wonderfully simple in premise yet stuffed full of comedy, charm and,  yes, scares a plenty.

If there's one stand-out aspect to Blink it's the Weeping Angels; simple and inventive, they're proof that the scariest monsters aren't ones that might "exterminate" or "delete" but merely deprive us of our simple, human instincts: in this case, blinking. If you look at them, they're stone, but if you blink... And even here Moffat shows his unique brilliance, because if the Angels touch you you don't instantly die as one might expect, instead they zap you back in time and let you live to death instead.

But as wonderful as the Angels are, they're matched by an immensely strong script. As finely paced as you could possibly expect, it never drags and is never rushed; and in less than forty-five minutes Moffat crafts characters that are more developed and more relatable than any that have come before, including full time companions. The roguish charm of Billy Shipton or the loveable naivety of Larry Nightingale; the star, however, is Sally Sparrow, brought to life by a then-unknown Carey Mulligan she's a heroin that is so instantly likeable, engaging and real, not a caricature that is befitting of so many of the Doctor's female acquaintances. If there's one downside to the episode it's that we never got to see more of these characters, though Sally and Larry are something of a prototype to Amy and Rory, and the tease of the new companion in Asylum Of The Daleks has proven Moffat is not done with giving his women memorable personas.



So there we have it. That's my top five, at least for now. Other considerations would be The Eleventh Hour, which I absolutely adore but it's too easy to have all top five be Moffat episodes; Utopia, which stands out on its own but is let down by the episodes that follow and The Doctor's Wife, which, while good, I've never quite warmed to as much as others have. 

Monday, 10 September 2012

Dinosaurs on a Spaceship - One for the kids.

So the seventh series of Doctor Who continues, but after a Steven Moffat kicked things off with a strong season opener, Chris Chibnall lowers the bar quite considerably with an unremarkable second episode. 



From the title alone we know what type of episode Dinosaurs on a Spaceship will be. Though the show lends itself beautifully to darker, more adult themes, at heart it will always be a bit of fun; forty minutes of escapism for the whole family to enjoy. There's a fine line, however, between harmless fun and the outright childish, and sadly Chibnall's fourth contribution to the Who mythos strays far too often onto the side of childish, and with a lazily constructed script to match one wonders if Dinosaurs was only ever a title, never an idea. 

Technology wise the animals themselves actually look surprisingly good (for Who standards), but like a lot of things in the episode they're there without reason or explanation. Though we learn the Silurians were responsible for putting them on the ship in the first place we're left pondering the real reason as to why; similarly the Doctor has two new companions for the episode - Egyptian Queen Nefertiti and an African big-game hunter named Riddell - but why he brings them along or how he really knows them in the first place is questionable. The same again goes for the introduction of Brian Williams, Rory's father, and though the interaction between father and son remains a highlight of the episode we're left wondering what he really adds to the proceedings.

The episode, however, doesn't fall apart over lack of justification over characters, it's when Chibnall tries to justify himself. With a title like Dinosaurs on a Spaceship we expect a certain amount of madness going in, but halfway through the episode Chibnall fears that he's got to give the reason madness to be there, and as a result Nefertiti and Riddell are romantically paired up and Brian Williams is subject to an all too convenient plot device, where we learn the crashing ship can only be controlled by two people who share a gene.

To Dinosaurs' credit, it is not as instantly forgettable as Chibnall's previous episodes, 42 and The Hungry Earth/Cold Blood. Neither good nor particularly bad, those episodes just don't linger in the mind the way, say, Moffat's strongest or Russell T Davies's worst might. Dinosaurs, however, will be remembered for all the wrong reasons. Convenient plot devices (the missiles are attracted to what exactly?), underdeveloped characters and awkward humour (the Mitchell and Webb robots were nothing short of annoying); children will, undoubtedly, get a kick out of it, but there is little to enjoy for anyone else. 



Monday, 3 September 2012

Asylum of the Daleks - A Whovian's Review.


And so the seventh – or is that thirty-second – series of Doctor Who starts, albeit a little earlier than expected, and after a somewhat convoluted sixth series that raised more questions than it answered my anticipation is huge that this year (and next) returns the show to the quality I know it’s capable of. Over the next five weeks, as we get our first helping of the season, I’ll be reviewing each episode as they air.

 

There was a lot of pressure resting on Steven Moffat’s shoulders over this first episode. Last year’s brisk paced, arc-heavy run of episodes had turned a lot of people off; Moffat himself needed to redeem his own name after the frankly disastrous Christmas special; and with his announcement that the seventh series would commence with a return of the Daleks, easily the Doctors most famous foe, there came one very simple, but seemingly impossible, promise: to make them scary again.

Did he succeed? Did this episode stand-alone but still set up an exciting series? Was it worth the wait? Was it funny enough, exciting enough, quirky enough? Most importantly, were the Daleks returned to their former glory? The answer, quite truthfully, is a resounding yes.

There will forever be an ongoing debate as to what is the best Dalek story there has ever been. Most say Genesis, some will say Resurrection, Destiny or maybe even Remembrance. Those unfamiliar with the classic years will undoubtedly say Dalek. I want to offer up a difference perspective and say that the best Dalek story ever told is one that has never been shown; and, hopefully, one that never will be.

Let’s be honest here, Dalek stories are a tough one to get right. For every Genesis there’s a Revelation; for every Day of there’s a Chase. Since the re-launch in 2005 the Daleks have suffered more than ever: after a triumphant return in Dalek and a surprising one in Bad Wolf, the Daleks haven’t had a single worthwhile story to their name. They’re a gimmick in Doomsday and an embarrassment in Evolution; they’re wasted in Journey’s End and their return was laughed at in Victory, but ever since Rose the Daleks have laid claim to the greatest story in Who history; one that is rife with ideas; of drama, of intrigue, and, to the die-hard fans, solutions to continuity. The Time War – or, as the Whovian in me will attest, the Last Great Time War. A story that belongs to everyone and one that shouldn’t ever fall upon the head of any one specific writer to get ‘right’. Only the Doctor knows what really went on there and he’s not telling, so neither should we.

The Time War should form the basis of any good Dalek story because it’s something that will always be at the back of the Doctor’s mind. You don’t have to know the details to know it affected him greatly; and if it’s on the Doctor’s mind it needs to be on the writer’s mind and actor’s mind, for only they can make us truly believe the history between the Doctor and the Daleks. Thankfully, here, we believe, because here Moffat has crafted a story that is fresh and engaging, paying homage to the entire history of Doctor Who and teasingly setting up the future. Like Dalek, the Time War casts a looming shadow, and like Dalek we really catch a glimpse of the Doctors inner most feelings. Matt Smith is at the top of his game here, because not since Christopher Eccleston came face-to-eye stalk with his nightmare for the first time do we fully understand the Doctor’s up most fear and hatred of these creatures of Skaro.

But that’s not all that makes this episode a success. As grown up as Doctor Who has gotten since Moffat took over as show-runner, suddenly it all feels scarily realistic too. Daleks and spaceships and time travel aside, there’s a surprising subplot to this episode that details Amy and Rory’s somewhat loveless marriage, as we learn that after the events of last season Amy is unable to conceive and the idea of not being able to bare Rory a normal, less flirtatious, grown-up, may-or-may-not-be-married-to-the-Doctor, child has put a serious strain on the relationship. If the knowing departure of Amy and Rory didn’t affect you when the news broke then it certainly will now, and though this episode goes a long way to tantalize and tease the new companion – take a bow, Jenna-Louise – the Ponds will, most assuredly, not be forgotten about. These are their episodes as much as anyone else’s, and we’re heading towards an unforgettable finale.

The finest Dalek story since Dalek, maybe even of all time, this episode certainly isn’t one to be missed. Did Moffat succeed in making the Daleks scary again? Well, fear is subjective, but there were certainly a few moments that could send a shiver down the spine of the older viewers whilst sending the younger straight behind the sofa. It works on it’s own and it sets up a series arc; Asylum of the Daleks is everything that it needed to be.